This group does not have any discussions yet.
Comment
Comment by Frank Subzda on February 18, 2013 at 1:43am Dear Colleagues,
Nationally we are looking for qualified, independent instructors who would be willing to work part time teaching safety courses that are specifically tailored to meet the identified needs of one of our clients. While these instructors would have little autonomy with course content, they will have the flexibility to meet state and local regulations as needed. The courses our client is currently interested in are:
If you know of interested instructors please have them contact Fran@ussafety.us
Comment by Frank Subzda on March 20, 2012 at 9:21am U.S. Safety provides safety consultants for the private sector, SSHO's & QCs for USACE/NAVFAC Projects and OTI and EM 385 Qualified Trainers for the classroom. Check us out at: www.ussafety.us
Comment by Frank Subzda on March 20, 2012 at 9:16am The tar kettle question on the NAVFAC Exam stimulated some thoughts. The EM 385 requires that the most stringent safety standard must be followed. Therefore some adjustments to our onsite applications need to be addressed.
EM 386.06.C.01.c Two 20-BC extinguishers within 25 feet
NFPA 241.9.4.1 One 20-B extinguisher 5-25 feet away
Solution: Two 20-BC extinguishers no closed that 5' or more than 25' away
EM 386.06.C.01.f Tar Kettle must have a tight closing lid
NFPA 241.9.2.3 Tar Kettle must have a gravity closing lid
Solution: Tar Kettle must have a tight, gravity closing lid
EM 386.06.C.01.a Tar Kettle must be downwind, secure footing & protected against
traffic, tripping or similar hazards
NFPA 241.9.2.1 Tar Kettle must be operated in a controlled area outside the bldg
Solution: Add the word “outside” to any section in 06.C.01
EM 386.06.C.01.j Tar Kettle must not exceed structural capacity of roof deck??
NFPA 241.9.2.2 Tar Kettle may not be located on roof
Solution: Tar Kettle may not be located on roof
Comment by Frank Subzda on March 20, 2012 at 9:06am We are looking for a SSHO (Site Safety & Health Officer) in South Florida that will have to be approved by the U.S. Army Corps Engineers. The job is short, but may develop into an extended position. Safety professionals that have been previously approved by the Corps as an SSHO would expedite the investigative process and allow us to maintain our time line. If you are, or have anyone in your data base that might be interest in this position, please share this information
Comment by Robert Kenneth Robinson on December 14, 2009 at 1:24am
Kevin Moore joined Susan Pereira's group
Maree Kyle posted a blog post
© 2013 Created by Safety Community.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Military & Government Work to add comments!