Online Safety Community

Here's a question that came up here at work the other day.
An employee of a construction company flew down to Mexico to get his sick wife (no confirmation that what she had was the swine flu, but it would seem, from the symptoms, that it was). The day after flying down there and bringing her back home he shows up for work.
The crew foreman wants to know what he can and can't do.
Can he force the man to stay home? Can he require him to get tested?
He doesn't want to pay the worker to stay home or he'll create a precedence.
Any suggestions on what he can and can't do?

Tags: Swine, flu, questions

Views: 13

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Can he get a Doctor's note before returning to work?
He might be able to but...
1. Can the company make him, seeing as he isn't sick himself
2. The confirmation of the swine flu takes a few days so it wouldn't really do much good.
I think it would depend on a lot of things, including the country and state, the company's leave policy, etc.

No I don't believe the foreman can 'force' the worker into getting tested. Does the company have a policy statement on liberal leave, illness, (preferably a pandemic policy). That is where you should start. What ever is decided, the company must make it an across the board policy to keep from discriminating.

Tell him Good Luck,

Pam
Heather,

I agree that if you make a rule up front you can hold employees to the choice that they make. Unfortunately, in this case there isn't a pandemic policy or any kind of rule that the employee knew about before he made the choice to go get his wife. Not sure what the ramifications would be for the company if they forced him to take time off without pay.
I would get a lawyer involved in figuring out what is legal to do. Does the employee want to come back to work?

Pam
Yes, the employee does not want to take time off work as he doesn't get paid.
This goes back to something that I posted a couple days back about sick time. I actually read in the Seattle Sun Times this morning that less than 36% of the work force has paid sick leave.
Telling these people to stay home when they are sick in order not to spread the flu isn't going to any more effective than the "Just say 'No!'" campaign to keep kids off of drugs.
What about having workers who exhibit symptoms or are caring for an ill family member with a confirmed or suspected case of H1N1 to be required to wear an N95 face mask? It would go a long way toward protecting other workers, without the requirement to stay home without pay.
I'm not sure what to do about a situation that has already happened. However, it is past time for the crew foreman to talk to the corporate, or the company lawyer.

I suspect the company doesn't have an emergency action plan, or at least not an effective one. The EAP will need to be upgraded to cover a situation like this in the future.

Pam
I agree. I'm not sure that there is much that they can do at this point but they might be able to learn from this and put something down on paper to avoid similar situations in the future.
This is something that might be a good idea for any company.

RSS

Take our poll!

Take our poll!

Latest Activity

Jack Lingner shared Maree Kyle's blog post on Twitter
6 hours ago
Enna Henry posted a discussion

Safety - A Prerequisite

Whether working at home or outside, to observe safety should be our pre-requisite. The employer before anything must be sure of the safety of its employees especially the ones working in mines or any other hazardous places. We, all must ensure to follow safety rules and abide by them to avoid accidents. There are risks involved in certain jobs or workings but for the fear of being hurt or any threat to life, we, cannot stop working. To avoid this we must wear safety suits or make use of safety…See More
10 hours ago
John Robinson posted events
11 hours ago
John Robinson shared their event on StumbleUpon
11 hours ago

Forum

Industrial head protection standard (Z89.1) to be revised; consensus viewers needed 1 Reply

The voluntary consensus standard, ANSI/ISEA Z89.1-2009, American National Standard for Industrial Head Protective is scheduled to be revised this year.  The standard, recognized by OSHA, includes the…Continue

Tags: OSHA, ISEA, Z89.1, hats, protection

Started by Cristine Fargo. Last reply by Ellen Zoneth 10 hours ago.

Safety - A Prerequisite 1 Reply

Whether working at home or outside, to observe safety should be our pre-requisite. The employer before anything must be sure of the safety of its employees especially the ones working in mines or any…Continue

Tags: products, safety

Started by Enna Henry. Last reply by Ellen Zoneth 10 hours ago.

About Me

Sarah Chamberland has completed a Diploma in Manufacturing and testing. His responsibilities include production and safety inspection of construction equipment and also repair services for equipment.…Continue

Started by Sarah Chamberland May 1.

Be a Safety Leader: Join Our Wolf Pack 1 Reply

We are looking for partners to make a commitment to safety by joining our Wolf Pack. By joining the pack, you are committing to the safety and well being of first responders and your own…Continue

Started by John Petropoulos Memorial Fund. Last reply by Ellen Zoneth Apr 24.

Road Safety Solutions 1 Reply

The Road Safety Signs ,Barriers,Humps,Hazard Markers and Visual Warnings are some of the important marks to be observed. Signs such as "keep left",stop, "give way" should not be casually treated.…Continue

Tags: safety, gear, wear, Equipment, &

Started by Enna Henry. Last reply by Ellen Zoneth Apr 24.

Badge

Loading…

© 2013   Created by Safety Community.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service